A Nation with no Narrative
Do we have
local text books written by indigenous experts in local idiom while
keeping in view local requirements and demands? Generally speaking, no.
The local think tank, not just some teachers or professors, should sit
together and survey other texts and copy paste or appropriate portion
from them and come up with a new but localized text. It needs deep and
critical engagement with the whole worldview that informs these texts
and an informed response based on our understanding of tradition or
heritage that we attempt to safeguard. In order to illustrate, I today
focus on history text books.
Firstly, we have imported paradigms of
historiography that starts from an evolutionist account that drops out
transcendence and relies exclusively on modern scientific narrative.
Secondly, we don’t have good local history of Kashmir, especially modern
Kashmir. Thirdly, we don’t have tools to appropriate references to
hagiography that appear incredible in light of modern rationalist
viewpoint. Fourthly, we don’t have critical understanding based on our
own assimilation of the tradition centred on Metaphysics to take on
modernity on our own terms. Fifthly, we largely ignore alternative
approaches that have surfaced up in the wake of post-modernity that are
better integrated with our traditional or received understanding. Ask
Kashmiri students – graduates and we will be disappointed by knowing
their abysmal ignorance regarding ancient, medieval and modern histories
of Kashmir. They know next to nothing about Buddhist school that
developed here, masterly works of Abhinavgupta, mysticism of Lalla,
metaphysics and aesthetics of Kashmir Saivism, subtlety of symbolism of
Kashmiri Sufi poets, meaning of Aknandun or even names of scores of folk
tales, politics of National Conference nomenclature vis-à-vis Muslim
Conference, Mirwaiz-Sheikh Abdullah rift, changes in cultural geography
in recent history, questions regarding accession document and almost
every important event in our history. This implies that our quest for
freedom and identity gets problematized until we take care. A few more
points detailed below further clarify my point.
We often give an impression in our
text books as if there is an agreed upon understanding of important
events and processes and ask students to remember them rather than
encourage to doubt and revisit the given narratives. There are many
histories, all conflicting with one another. There could be many
approaches to history. Communal, nationalistic, mystical or
transcendentalist, Marxist, historicist, new historicist and so on. All
the modern approaches that have been used to approach Euro-American
orAsian history have been transposed to Indian/Kashmiri history. We have
a plethora of viewpoints on significance of almost all important points
and we have yet to agree on even such basic issues as who were Aryans,
antiquity of Vedas, prevalence of heterodox philosophical systems,
historicity of characters in Epics etc. The traditional is no longer the
case. The History of India is exploded as a myth replaced by histories.
Brahmins, Dalits, Buddhists, Secularists have their own narratives and
certain radical historians question all of them. We have largely erased
histories of devadasis, sudras, adivasis etc. Orthodox positions have
been jolted and now we have fragments. Brahmins had not cared to focus
on histories but today books such as Hindus expose some unsightly
aspects. Meanings and messages are no longer simplistically read. There
are no great men or heroes in the chronicle of class wars for some.
Taking post-independence history as our point of reference things is no
less obscure. We have fragmentary and contradictory narratives. Who was
responsible for partition? Was it a dagger of colonialism? Have we lost
much that we identified as most importantly ours for so long? Has
globalization erased our distinct history or we have betrayed glorious
heritage? The tussles between nationalists and communalists and between
many other groups such as subalteran, Marxist, environmentalist,
saffronizers and Islamizers are continuing.
Villians and heroes often change
clothes. Our historians and text book writers have to consider
possibility of dialogue between the account bequeathed by tradition and
mostly memorized in folk memory and dissenting perspectives that are
continuously multiplying and both illuminating and obscuring our view of
our former selves or history. It may well bethat history belongs to
those who can write it. On how little can we agree besides dates of birth
or death of kings/empires is amazing.
http://kashmirreader.com/a-nation-with-no-narrative-17888
http://kashmirreader.com/a-nation-with-no-narrative-17888
Comments
Post a Comment